From 7b2c7b6233497bfab8826ece574bc1c26e97478d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:28:01 +0200 Subject: arm64/stacktrace: Remove the pointless ULONG_MAX marker Terminating the last trace entry with ULONG_MAX is a completely pointless exercise and none of the consumers can rely on it because it's inconsistently implemented across architectures. In fact quite some of the callers remove the entry and adjust stack_trace.nr_entries afterwards. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Alexander Potapenko Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190410103644.220247845@linutronix.de --- arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm64/kernel') diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c index d908b5e9e949..b00ec7d483d1 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -140,8 +140,6 @@ void save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace) #endif walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_trace, &data); - if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries) - trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace_regs); @@ -172,8 +170,6 @@ static noinline void __save_stack_trace(struct task_struct *tsk, #endif walk_stackframe(tsk, &frame, save_trace, &data); - if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries) - trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX; put_task_stack(tsk); } -- cgit v1.2.3