From aad800403a8761073511abb93075738302983956 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Wunner Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 13:10:04 +0100 Subject: Documentation/core-api/device_link: Add initial documentation Document device links as introduced in v4.10 with commits: 4bdb35506b89 ("driver core: Add a wrapper around __device_release_driver()") 9ed9895370ae ("driver core: Functional dependencies tracking support") 8c73b4288496 ("PM / sleep: Make async suspend/resume of devices use device links") 21d5c57b3726 ("PM / runtime: Use device links") baa8809f6097 ("PM / runtime: Optimize the use of device links") Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner [ jc: Moved from core-api to driver-api ] Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst | 279 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 279 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst (limited to 'Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst') diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5f5713448703 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@ +============ +Device links +============ + +By default, the driver core only enforces dependencies between devices +that are borne out of a parent/child relationship within the device +hierarchy: When suspending, resuming or shutting down the system, devices +are ordered based on this relationship, i.e. children are always suspended +before their parent, and the parent is always resumed before its children. + +Sometimes there is a need to represent device dependencies beyond the +mere parent/child relationship, e.g. between siblings, and have the +driver core automatically take care of them. + +Secondly, the driver core by default does not enforce any driver presence +dependencies, i.e. that one device must be bound to a driver before +another one can probe or function correctly. + +Often these two dependency types come together, so a device depends on +another one both with regards to driver presence *and* with regards to +suspend/resume and shutdown ordering. + +Device links allow representation of such dependencies in the driver core. + +In its standard form, a device link combines *both* dependency types: +It guarantees correct suspend/resume and shutdown ordering between a +"supplier" device and its "consumer" devices, and it guarantees driver +presence on the supplier. The consumer devices are not probed before the +supplier is bound to a driver, and they're unbound before the supplier +is unbound. + +When driver presence on the supplier is irrelevant and only correct +suspend/resume and shutdown ordering is needed, the device link may +simply be set up with the ``DL_FLAG_STATELESS`` flag. In other words, +enforcing driver presence on the supplier is optional. + +Another optional feature is runtime PM integration: By setting the +``DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME`` flag on addition of the device link, the PM core +is instructed to runtime resume the supplier and keep it active +whenever and for as long as the consumer is runtime resumed. + +Usage +===== + +The earliest point in time when device links can be added is after +:c:func:`device_add()` has been called for the supplier and +:c:func:`device_initialize()` has been called for the consumer. + +It is legal to add them later, but care must be taken that the system +remains in a consistent state: E.g. a device link cannot be added in +the midst of a suspend/resume transition, so either commencement of +such a transition needs to be prevented with :c:func:`lock_system_sleep()`, +or the device link needs to be added from a function which is guaranteed +not to run in parallel to a suspend/resume transition, such as from a +device ``->probe`` callback or a boot-time PCI quirk. + +Another example for an inconsistent state would be a device link that +represents a driver presence dependency, yet is added from the consumer's +``->probe`` callback while the supplier hasn't probed yet: Had the driver +core known about the device link earlier, it wouldn't have probed the +consumer in the first place. The onus is thus on the consumer to check +presence of the supplier after adding the link, and defer probing on +non-presence. + +If a device link is added in the ``->probe`` callback of the supplier or +consumer driver, it is typically deleted in its ``->remove`` callback for +symmetry. That way, if the driver is compiled as a module, the device +link is added on module load and orderly deleted on unload. The same +restrictions that apply to device link addition (e.g. exclusion of a +parallel suspend/resume transition) apply equally to deletion. + +Several flags may be specified on device link addition, two of which +have already been mentioned above: ``DL_FLAG_STATELESS`` to express that no +driver presence dependency is needed (but only correct suspend/resume and +shutdown ordering) and ``DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME`` to express that runtime PM +integration is desired. + +Two other flags are specifically targeted at use cases where the device +link is added from the consumer's ``->probe`` callback: ``DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE`` +can be specified to runtime resume the supplier upon addition of the +device link. ``DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE`` causes the device link to be automatically +purged when the consumer fails to probe or later unbinds. This obviates +the need to explicitly delete the link in the ``->remove`` callback or in +the error path of the ``->probe`` callback. + +Limitations +=========== + +Driver authors should be aware that a driver presence dependency (i.e. when +``DL_FLAG_STATELESS`` is not specified on link addition) may cause probing of +the consumer to be deferred indefinitely. This can become a problem if the +consumer is required to probe before a certain initcall level is reached. +Worse, if the supplier driver is blacklisted or missing, the consumer will +never be probed. + +Sometimes drivers depend on optional resources. They are able to operate +in a degraded mode (reduced feature set or performance) when those resources +are not present. An example is an SPI controller that can use a DMA engine +or work in PIO mode. The controller can determine presence of the optional +resources at probe time but on non-presence there is no way to know whether +they will become available in the near future (due to a supplier driver +probing) or never. Consequently it cannot be determined whether to defer +probing or not. It would be possible to notify drivers when optional +resources become available after probing, but it would come at a high cost +for drivers as switching between modes of operation at runtime based on the +availability of such resources would be much more complex than a mechanism +based on probe deferral. In any case optional resources are beyond the +scope of device links. + +Examples +======== + +* An MMU device exists alongside a busmaster device, both are in the same + power domain. The MMU implements DMA address translation for the busmaster + device and shall be runtime resumed and kept active whenever and as long + as the busmaster device is active. The busmaster device's driver shall + not bind before the MMU is bound. To achieve this, a device link with + runtime PM integration is added from the busmaster device (consumer) + to the MMU device (supplier). The effect with regards to runtime PM + is the same as if the MMU was the parent of the master device. + + The fact that both devices share the same power domain would normally + suggest usage of a :c:type:`struct dev_pm_domain` or :c:type:`struct + generic_pm_domain`, however these are not independent devices that + happen to share a power switch, but rather the MMU device serves the + busmaster device and is useless without it. A device link creates a + synthetic hierarchical relationship between the devices and is thus + more apt. + +* A Thunderbolt host controller comprises a number of PCIe hotplug ports + and an NHI device to manage the PCIe switch. On resume from system sleep, + the NHI device needs to re-establish PCI tunnels to attached devices + before the hotplug ports can resume. If the hotplug ports were children + of the NHI, this resume order would automatically be enforced by the + PM core, but unfortunately they're aunts. The solution is to add + device links from the hotplug ports (consumers) to the NHI device + (supplier). A driver presence dependency is not necessary for this + use case. + +* Discrete GPUs in hybrid graphics laptops often feature an HDA controller + for HDMI/DP audio. In the device hierarchy the HDA controller is a sibling + of the VGA device, yet both share the same power domain and the HDA + controller is only ever needed when an HDMI/DP display is attached to the + VGA device. A device link from the HDA controller (consumer) to the + VGA device (supplier) aptly represents this relationship. + +* ACPI allows definition of a device start order by way of _DEP objects. + A classical example is when ACPI power management methods on one device + are implemented in terms of I\ :sup:`2`\ C accesses and require a specific + I\ :sup:`2`\ C controller to be present and functional for the power + management of the device in question to work. + +* In some SoCs a functional dependency exists from display, video codec and + video processing IP cores on transparent memory access IP cores that handle + burst access and compression/decompression. + +Alternatives +============ + +* A :c:type:`struct dev_pm_domain` can be used to override the bus, + class or device type callbacks. It is intended for devices sharing + a single on/off switch, however it does not guarantee a specific + suspend/resume ordering, this needs to be implemented separately. + It also does not by itself track the runtime PM status of the involved + devices and turn off the power switch only when all of them are runtime + suspended. Furthermore it cannot be used to enforce a specific shutdown + ordering or a driver presence dependency. + +* A :c:type:`struct generic_pm_domain` is a lot more heavyweight than a + device link and does not allow for shutdown ordering or driver presence + dependencies. It also cannot be used on ACPI systems. + +Implementation +============== + +The device hierarchy, which -- as the name implies -- is a tree, +becomes a directed acyclic graph once device links are added. + +Ordering of these devices during suspend/resume is determined by the +dpm_list. During shutdown it is determined by the devices_kset. With +no device links present, the two lists are a flattened, one-dimensional +representations of the device tree such that a device is placed behind +all its ancestors. That is achieved by traversing the ACPI namespace +or OpenFirmware device tree top-down and appending devices to the lists +as they are discovered. + +Once device links are added, the lists need to satisfy the additional +constraint that a device is placed behind all its suppliers, recursively. +To ensure this, upon addition of the device link the consumer and the +entire sub-graph below it (all children and consumers of the consumer) +are moved to the end of the list. (Call to :c:func:`device_reorder_to_tail()` +from :c:func:`device_link_add()`.) + +To prevent introduction of dependency loops into the graph, it is +verified upon device link addition that the supplier is not dependent +on the consumer or any children or consumers of the consumer. +(Call to :c:func:`device_is_dependent()` from :c:func:`device_link_add()`.) +If that constraint is violated, :c:func:`device_link_add()` will return +``NULL`` and a ``WARNING`` will be logged. + +Notably this also prevents the addition of a device link from a parent +device to a child. However the converse is allowed, i.e. a device link +from a child to a parent. Since the driver core already guarantees +correct suspend/resume and shutdown ordering between parent and child, +such a device link only makes sense if a driver presence dependency is +needed on top of that. In this case driver authors should weigh +carefully if a device link is at all the right tool for the purpose. +A more suitable approach might be to simply use deferred probing or +add a device flag causing the parent driver to be probed before the +child one. + +State machine +============= + +.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/device.h + :functions: device_link_state + +:: + + .=============================. + | | + v | + DORMANT <=> AVAILABLE <=> CONSUMER_PROBE => ACTIVE + ^ | + | | + '============ SUPPLIER_UNBIND <============' + +* The initial state of a device link is automatically determined by + :c:func:`device_link_add()` based on the driver presence on the supplier + and consumer. If the link is created before any devices are probed, it + is set to ``DL_STATE_DORMANT``. + +* When a supplier device is bound to a driver, links to its consumers + progress to ``DL_STATE_AVAILABLE``. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_driver_bound()` from + :c:func:`driver_bound()`.) + +* Before a consumer device is probed, presence of supplier drivers is + verified by checking that links to suppliers are in ``DL_STATE_AVAILABLE`` + state. The state of the links is updated to ``DL_STATE_CONSUMER_PROBE``. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_check_suppliers()` from + :c:func:`really_probe()`.) + This prevents the supplier from unbinding. + (Call to :c:func:`wait_for_device_probe()` from + :c:func:`device_links_unbind_consumers()`.) + +* If the probe fails, links to suppliers revert back to ``DL_STATE_AVAILABLE``. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_no_driver()` from :c:func:`really_probe()`.) + +* If the probe succeeds, links to suppliers progress to ``DL_STATE_ACTIVE``. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_driver_bound()` from :c:func:`driver_bound()`.) + +* When the consumer's driver is later on removed, links to suppliers revert + back to ``DL_STATE_AVAILABLE``. + (Call to :c:func:`__device_links_no_driver()` from + :c:func:`device_links_driver_cleanup()`, which in turn is called from + :c:func:`__device_release_driver()`.) + +* Before a supplier's driver is removed, links to consumers that are not + bound to a driver are updated to ``DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND``. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_busy()` from + :c:func:`__device_release_driver()`.) + This prevents the consumers from binding. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_check_suppliers()` from + :c:func:`really_probe()`.) + Consumers that are bound are freed from their driver; consumers that are + probing are waited for until they are done. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_unbind_consumers()` from + :c:func:`__device_release_driver()`.) + Once all links to consumers are in ``DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND`` state, + the supplier driver is released and the links revert to ``DL_STATE_DORMANT``. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_driver_cleanup()` from + :c:func:`__device_release_driver()`.) + +API +=== + +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/base/core.c + :functions: device_link_add device_link_del -- cgit v1.2.3