From b6d8878d24e39f213df0f3ea7abebd15edc7be21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Rutland Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:48:12 +0000 Subject: arm64: syscall: include prototype for EL0 SVC functions The kbuild test robot reports that when building with W=1, GCC will warn for a couple of missing prototypes in syscall.c: | arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:157:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_el0_svc' [-Wmissing-prototypes] | 157 | void do_el0_svc(struct pt_regs *regs) | | ^~~~~~~~~~ | arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:164:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_el0_svc_compat' [-Wmissing-prototypes] | 164 | void do_el0_svc_compat(struct pt_regs *regs) | | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ While this isn't a functional problem, as a general policy we should include the prototype for functions wherever possible to catch any accidental divergence between the prototype and implementation. Here we can easily include , so let's do so. While there are a number of warnings elsewhere and some warnings enabled under W=1 are of questionable benefit, this change helps to make the code more robust as it evolved and reduces the noise somewhat, so it seems worthwhile. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Reported-by: kernel test robot Cc: Will Deacon Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202101141046.n8iPO3mw-lkp@intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210114124812.17754-1-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas --- arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c index 0bfac95fe464..c2877c332f2d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include #include -- cgit v1.2.3