From 9a8b27fac5bbb77337cc2e5d31d37c9936782d87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shaohua Li Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:22:13 -0700 Subject: raid5-cache: correct condition for empty metadata write As long as we recover one metadata block, we should write the empty metadata write. The original code could make recovery corrupted if only one meta is valid. Reported-by: Zhengyuan Liu Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li --- drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c index 981f85515191..a227a9f3ee65 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c @@ -1087,7 +1087,7 @@ static int r5l_recovery_log(struct r5l_log *log) * 1's seq + 10 and let superblock points to meta2. The same recovery will * not think meta 3 is a valid meta, because its seq doesn't match */ - if (ctx.seq > log->last_cp_seq + 1) { + if (ctx.seq > log->last_cp_seq) { int ret; ret = r5l_log_write_empty_meta_block(log, ctx.pos, ctx.seq + 10); -- cgit v1.2.3