From 976492922a6a9c06f6f61436848adf2f03702e5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robin Murphy Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:24:51 +0100 Subject: iommu/arm-smmu: Update impl quirks comment The comment about implementation and integration quirks being mutually-exclusive is out of date, and in fact the code is already structured for the case it anticipates, so document that properly. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1e742177e084621f3454fbaf768325a6c215656a.1592994291.git.robin.murphy@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c index c75b9d957b70..1fb4bb994dbf 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c @@ -153,10 +153,9 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node; /* - * We will inevitably have to combine model-specific implementation - * quirks with platform-specific integration quirks, but everything - * we currently support happens to work out as straightforward - * mutually-exclusive assignments. + * Set the impl for model-specific implementation quirks first, + * such that platform integration quirks can pick it up and + * inherit from it if necessary. */ switch (smmu->model) { case ARM_MMU500: @@ -168,6 +167,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) break; } + /* This is implicitly MMU-400 */ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "calxeda,smmu-secure-config-access")) smmu->impl = &calxeda_impl; -- cgit v1.2.3