From 394134fd9f999f3826b1d64d648f26e5288824d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steffen Maier Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:31:00 +0200 Subject: scsi: zfcp: clarify that we don't need "link" test on failed open port Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen --- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c index c10b4b9f1574..9f73b8fc7f3b 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ * * Implementation of FSF commands. * - * Copyright IBM Corp. 2002, 2015 + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2002, 2017 */ #define KMSG_COMPONENT "zfcp" @@ -1393,6 +1393,8 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_open_port_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req) case FSF_ADAPTER_STATUS_AVAILABLE: switch (header->fsf_status_qual.word[0]) { case FSF_SQ_INVOKE_LINK_TEST_PROCEDURE: + /* no zfcp_fc_test_link() with failed open port */ + /* fall through */ case FSF_SQ_ULP_DEPENDENT_ERP_REQUIRED: case FSF_SQ_NO_RETRY_POSSIBLE: req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR; -- cgit v1.2.3