From 0b786e41c73956126f6297764459021deef8aba7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Imre Deak Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:37:30 +0300 Subject: drm/i915/bxt: Avoid early timeout during PLL enable Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by using the non-atomic wait_for instead. I noticed this via the PLL locking timing out incorrectly, with this fix I couldn't reproduce the problem. Fixes: 0351b93992aa ("drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic timeout granularity") CC: Chris Wilson CC: Tvrtko Ursulin Signed-off-by: Imre Deak Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin CC: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467110253-16046-2-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c index c0eff1571731..e130c3ed2b6e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c @@ -1374,8 +1374,8 @@ static void bxt_ddi_pll_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, I915_WRITE(BXT_PORT_PLL_ENABLE(port), temp); POSTING_READ(BXT_PORT_PLL_ENABLE(port)); - if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(BXT_PORT_PLL_ENABLE(port)) & - PORT_PLL_LOCK), 200)) + if (wait_for_us((I915_READ(BXT_PORT_PLL_ENABLE(port)) & PORT_PLL_LOCK), + 200)) DRM_ERROR("PLL %d not locked\n", port); /* -- cgit v1.2.3