diff options
| author | Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> | 2017-11-15 17:35:33 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-11-15 18:21:04 -0800 |
| commit | b4e98d9ac775907cc53fb08fcb6776deb7694e30 (patch) | |
| tree | 4a82caff5eab86a66f078622acfd68df5ac92235 /mm/oom_kill.c | |
| parent | 7d6c4dfa4de96d11b9d6adaf5aa5ca8c54670258 (diff) | |
| download | linux-b4e98d9ac775907cc53fb08fcb6776deb7694e30.tar.bz2 | |
mm: account pud page tables
On a machine with 5-level paging support a process can allocate
significant amount of memory and stay unnoticed by oom-killer and memory
cgroup. The trick is to allocate a lot of PUD page tables. We don't
account PUD page tables, only PMD and PTE.
We already addressed the same issue for PMD page tables, see commit
dc6c9a35b66b ("mm: account pmd page tables to the process").
Introduction of 5-level paging brings the same issue for PUD page
tables.
The patch expands accounting to PUD level.
[kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com: s/pmd_t/pud_t/]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171004074305.x35eh5u7ybbt5kar@black.fi.intel.com
[heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com: s390/mm: fix pud table accounting]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171103090551.18231-1-heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171002080427.3320-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/oom_kill.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/oom_kill.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index 3023919970f7..f642a45b7f14 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -221,7 +221,8 @@ unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, * task's rss, pagetable and swap space use. */ points = get_mm_rss(p->mm) + get_mm_counter(p->mm, MM_SWAPENTS) + - atomic_long_read(&p->mm->nr_ptes) + mm_nr_pmds(p->mm); + atomic_long_read(&p->mm->nr_ptes) + mm_nr_pmds(p->mm) + + mm_nr_puds(p->mm); task_unlock(p); /* @@ -397,7 +398,7 @@ static void dump_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask) struct task_struct *p; struct task_struct *task; - pr_info("[ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss nr_ptes nr_pmds swapents oom_score_adj name\n"); + pr_info("[ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss nr_ptes nr_pmds nr_puds swapents oom_score_adj name\n"); rcu_read_lock(); for_each_process(p) { if (oom_unkillable_task(p, memcg, nodemask)) @@ -413,11 +414,12 @@ static void dump_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask) continue; } - pr_info("[%5d] %5d %5d %8lu %8lu %7ld %7ld %8lu %5hd %s\n", + pr_info("[%5d] %5d %5d %8lu %8lu %7ld %7ld %7ld %8lu %5hd %s\n", task->pid, from_kuid(&init_user_ns, task_uid(task)), task->tgid, task->mm->total_vm, get_mm_rss(task->mm), atomic_long_read(&task->mm->nr_ptes), mm_nr_pmds(task->mm), + mm_nr_puds(task->mm), get_mm_counter(task->mm, MM_SWAPENTS), task->signal->oom_score_adj, task->comm); task_unlock(task); |