diff options
author | yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> | 2019-12-13 09:49:00 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> | 2019-12-14 17:47:13 -0500 |
commit | a70fd5ac2ea787cafe07b69dadd16b3648ad64ac (patch) | |
tree | abffbc82ddb7b46bd87a92f05aa5707972c80e16 /fs | |
parent | 7f420d64a08c1dcd65b27be82a27cf2bdb2e7847 (diff) | |
download | linux-a70fd5ac2ea787cafe07b69dadd16b3648ad64ac.tar.bz2 |
ext4: reserve revoke credits in __ext4_new_inode
It's possible that __ext4_new_inode will release the xattr block, so
it will trigger a warning since there is revoke credits will be 0 if
the handle == NULL. The below scripts can reproduce it easily.
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3861 at fs/jbd2/revoke.c:374 jbd2_journal_revoke+0x30e/0x540 fs/jbd2/revoke.c:374
...
__ext4_forget+0x1d7/0x800 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:248
ext4_free_blocks+0x213/0x1d60 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:4743
ext4_xattr_release_block+0x55b/0x780 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1254
ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1c2c/0x2c40 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2112
ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa7e/0x1090 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2384
__ext4_set_acl+0x54d/0x6c0 fs/ext4/acl.c:214
ext4_init_acl+0x218/0x2e0 fs/ext4/acl.c:293
__ext4_new_inode+0x352a/0x42b0 fs/ext4/ialloc.c:1151
ext4_mkdir+0x2e9/0xbd0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2774
vfs_mkdir+0x386/0x5f0 fs/namei.c:3811
do_mkdirat+0x11c/0x210 fs/namei.c:3834
do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x530 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
...
-------------------------------------
scripts:
mkfs.ext4 /dev/vdb
mount /dev/vdb /mnt
cd /mnt && mkdir dir && for i in {1..8}; do setfacl -dm "u:user_"$i":rx" dir; done
mkdir dir/dir1 && mv dir/dir1 ./
sh repro.sh && add some user
[root@localhost ~]# cat repro.sh
while [ 1 -eq 1 ]; do
rm -rf dir
rm -rf dir1/dir1
mkdir dir
for i in {1..8}; do setfacl -dm "u:test"$i":rx" dir; done
setfacl -m "u:user_9:rx" dir &
mkdir dir1/dir1 &
done
Before exec repro.sh, dir1 has inherit the default acl from dir, and
xattr block of dir1 dir is not the same, so the h_refcount of these
two dir's xattr block will be 1. Then repro.sh can trigger the warning
with the situation show as below. The last h_refcount can be clear
with mkdir, and __ext4_new_inode has not reserved revoke credits, so
the warning will happened, fix it by reserve revoke credits in
__ext4_new_inode.
Thread 1 Thread 2
mkdir dir
set default acl(will create
a xattr block blk1 and the
refcount of ext4_xattr_header
will be 1)
...
mkdir dir1/dir1
->....->ext4_init_acl
->__ext4_set_acl(set default acl,
will reuse blk1, and h_refcount
will be 2)
setfacl->ext4_set_acl->...
->ext4_xattr_block_set(will create
new block blk2 to store xattr)
->__ext4_set_acl(set access acl, since
h_refcount of blk1 is 2, will create
blk3 to store xattr)
->ext4_xattr_release_block(dec
h_refcount of blk1 to 1)
->ext4_xattr_release_block(dec
h_refcount and since it is 0,
will release the block and trigger
the warning)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213014900.47228-1-yangerkun@huawei.com
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c index dc333e8e51e8..8ca4a23129aa 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c @@ -921,8 +921,8 @@ repeat_in_this_group: if (!handle) { BUG_ON(nblocks <= 0); handle = __ext4_journal_start_sb(dir->i_sb, line_no, - handle_type, nblocks, - 0, 0); + handle_type, nblocks, 0, + ext4_trans_default_revoke_credits(sb)); if (IS_ERR(handle)) { err = PTR_ERR(handle); ext4_std_error(sb, err); |