diff options
author | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> | 2012-01-10 11:54:07 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> | 2012-01-10 11:54:07 -0500 |
commit | ff9cb1c4eead5e4c292e75cd3170a82d66944101 (patch) | |
tree | cdb132a39e550a9b7b28ea67544cb86cd6ebdb6e /fs/jbd2 | |
parent | e4e11180dfa545233e5145919b75b7fac88638df (diff) | |
parent | d50f2ab6f050311dbf7b8f5501b25f0bf64a439b (diff) | |
download | linux-ff9cb1c4eead5e4c292e75cd3170a82d66944101.tar.bz2 |
Merge branch 'for_linus' into for_linus_merged
Conflicts:
fs/ext4/ioctl.c
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/jbd2')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/jbd2/commit.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 34 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 5 |
3 files changed, 43 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c index 68d704db787f..5069b8475150 100644 --- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c @@ -430,6 +430,12 @@ void jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal) jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 1\n"); /* + * Clear revoked flag to reflect there is no revoked buffers + * in the next transaction which is going to be started. + */ + jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal); + + /* * Switch to a new revoke table. */ jbd2_journal_switch_revoke_table(journal); diff --git a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c index 69fd93588118..30b2867d6cc9 100644 --- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c @@ -47,6 +47,10 @@ * overwriting the new data. We don't even need to clear the revoke * bit here. * + * We cache revoke status of a buffer in the current transaction in b_states + * bits. As the name says, revokevalid flag indicates that the cached revoke + * status of a buffer is valid and we can rely on the cached status. + * * Revoke information on buffers is a tri-state value: * * RevokeValid clear: no cached revoke status, need to look it up @@ -478,6 +482,36 @@ int jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(handle_t *handle, struct journal_head *jh) return did_revoke; } +/* + * journal_clear_revoked_flag clears revoked flag of buffers in + * revoke table to reflect there is no revoked buffers in the next + * transaction which is going to be started. + */ +void jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal_t *journal) +{ + struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *revoke = journal->j_revoke; + int i = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < revoke->hash_size; i++) { + struct list_head *hash_list; + struct list_head *list_entry; + hash_list = &revoke->hash_table[i]; + + list_for_each(list_entry, hash_list) { + struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *record; + struct buffer_head *bh; + record = (struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *)list_entry; + bh = __find_get_block(journal->j_fs_dev, + record->blocknr, + journal->j_blocksize); + if (bh) { + clear_buffer_revoked(bh); + __brelse(bh); + } + } + } +} + /* journal_switch_revoke table select j_revoke for next transaction * we do not want to suspend any processing until all revokes are * written -bzzz diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c index a0e41a4c080e..35ae096bed5d 100644 --- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c @@ -517,12 +517,13 @@ void jbd2_journal_lock_updates(journal_t *journal) break; spin_lock(&transaction->t_handle_lock); + prepare_to_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait, + TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); if (!atomic_read(&transaction->t_updates)) { spin_unlock(&transaction->t_handle_lock); + finish_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait); break; } - prepare_to_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait, - TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); spin_unlock(&transaction->t_handle_lock); write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock); schedule(); |