diff options
author | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> | 2016-12-07 15:24:12 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> | 2016-12-07 15:24:12 +0100 |
commit | acf1fcf77247efa01d7213f53082451f6c9c8f3b (patch) | |
tree | 7f4acc733d5384e0f342240a82c6156f5619e80c /Documentation | |
parent | eb485c7d9e6d71e4f621edb83573cb85c1d22975 (diff) | |
parent | 35ca3f61617db77364e40c1977952c5ee0a776cb (diff) | |
download | linux-acf1fcf77247efa01d7213f53082451f6c9c8f3b.tar.bz2 |
Merge branch 'thread-irq-simpler' into devel
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/gpio/driver.txt | 62 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/gpio/driver.txt b/Documentation/gpio/driver.txt index 368d5a294d89..747c721776ed 100644 --- a/Documentation/gpio/driver.txt +++ b/Documentation/gpio/driver.txt @@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ The IRQ portions of the GPIO block are implemented using an irqchip, using the header <linux/irq.h>. So basically such a driver is utilizing two sub- systems simultaneously: gpio and irq. -RT_FULL: GPIO driver should not use spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs -(like PM runtime) as part of its irq_chip implementation on -RT. +RT_FULL: a realtime compliant GPIO driver should not use spinlock_t or any +sleepable APIs (like PM runtime) as part of its irq_chip implementation. - spinlock_t should be replaced with raw_spinlock_t [1]. - If sleepable APIs have to be used, these can be done from the .irq_bus_lock() and .irq_bus_unlock() callbacks, as these are the only slowpath callbacks @@ -185,33 +185,32 @@ RT_FULL: GPIO driver should not use spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs GPIO irqchips usually fall in one of two categories: * CHAINED GPIO irqchips: these are usually the type that is embedded on - an SoC. This means that there is a fast IRQ handler for the GPIOs that + an SoC. This means that there is a fast IRQ flow handler for the GPIOs that gets called in a chain from the parent IRQ handler, most typically the - system interrupt controller. This means the GPIO irqchip is registered - using irq_set_chained_handler() or the corresponding - gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip() helper function, and the GPIO irqchip - handler will be called immediately from the parent irqchip, while - holding the IRQs disabled. The GPIO irqchip will then end up calling - something like this sequence in its interrupt handler: - - static irqreturn_t tc3589x_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data) + system interrupt controller. This means that the GPIO irqchip handler will + be called immediately from the parent irqchip, while holding the IRQs + disabled. The GPIO irqchip will then end up calling something like this + sequence in its interrupt handler: + + static irqreturn_t foo_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data) chained_irq_enter(...); generic_handle_irq(...); chained_irq_exit(...); Chained GPIO irqchips typically can NOT set the .can_sleep flag on - struct gpio_chip, as everything happens directly in the callbacks. + struct gpio_chip, as everything happens directly in the callbacks: no + slow bus traffic like I2C can be used. RT_FULL: Note, chained IRQ handlers will not be forced threaded on -RT. As result, spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs (like PM runtime) can't be used in chained IRQ handler. - if required (and if it can't be converted to the nested threaded GPIO irqchip) - - chained IRQ handler can be converted to generic irq handler and this way - it will be threaded IRQ handler on -RT and hard IRQ handler on non-RT + If required (and if it can't be converted to the nested threaded GPIO irqchip) + a chained IRQ handler can be converted to generic irq handler and this way + it will be a threaded IRQ handler on -RT and a hard IRQ handler on non-RT (for example, see [3]). Know W/A: The generic_handle_irq() is expected to be called with IRQ disabled, - so IRQ core will complain if it will be called from IRQ handler which is - forced thread. The "fake?" raw lock can be used to W/A this problem: + so the IRQ core will complain if it is called from an IRQ handler which is + forced to a thread. The "fake?" raw lock can be used to W/A this problem: raw_spinlock_t wa_lock; static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank) @@ -243,7 +242,7 @@ GPIO irqchips usually fall in one of two categories: by the driver. The hallmark of this driver is to call something like this in its interrupt handler: - static irqreturn_t tc3589x_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data) + static irqreturn_t foo_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data) ... handle_nested_irq(irq); @@ -256,23 +255,31 @@ associated irqdomain and resource allocation callbacks, the gpiolib has some helpers that can be enabled by selecting the GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP Kconfig symbol: -* gpiochip_irqchip_add(): adds an irqchip to a gpiochip. It will pass +* gpiochip_irqchip_add(): adds a chained irqchip to a gpiochip. It will pass the struct gpio_chip* for the chip to all IRQ callbacks, so the callbacks need to embed the gpio_chip in its state container and obtain a pointer to the container using container_of(). (See Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt) - If there is a need to exclude certain GPIOs from the IRQ domain, one can - set .irq_need_valid_mask of the gpiochip before gpiochip_add_data() is - called. This allocates .irq_valid_mask with as many bits set as there are - GPIOs in the chip. Drivers can exclude GPIOs by clearing bits from this - mask. The mask must be filled in before gpiochip_irqchip_add() is called. +* gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(): adds a nested irqchip to a gpiochip. + Apart from that it works exactly like the chained irqchip. * gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(): sets up a chained irq handler for a gpio_chip from a parent IRQ and passes the struct gpio_chip* as handler data. (Notice handler data, since the irqchip data is likely used by the - parent irqchip!) This is for the chained type of chip. This is also used - to set up a nested irqchip if NULL is passed as handler. + parent irqchip!). + +* gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(): sets up a nested irq handler for a + gpio_chip from a parent IRQ. As the parent IRQ has usually been + explicitly requested by the driver, this does very little more than + mark all the child IRQs as having the other IRQ as parent. + +If there is a need to exclude certain GPIOs from the IRQ domain, you can +set .irq_need_valid_mask of the gpiochip before gpiochip_add_data() is +called. This allocates an .irq_valid_mask with as many bits set as there +are GPIOs in the chip. Drivers can exclude GPIOs by clearing bits from this +mask. The mask must be filled in before gpiochip_irqchip_add() or +gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested() is called. To use the helpers please keep the following in mind: @@ -323,6 +330,9 @@ When implementing an irqchip inside a GPIO driver, these two functions should typically be called in the .startup() and .shutdown() callbacks from the irqchip. +When using the gpiolib irqchip helpers, these callback are automatically +assigned. + Real-Time compliance for GPIO IRQ chips --------------------------------------- |